<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Atomic Playboy&#187; usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/tag/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atomicplayboy.net</link>
	<description>All hail the mushroom cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 19:43:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bookmarks for 26/01 through 02/02</title>
		<link>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/02/02/links/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/02/02/links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan Svensson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu-Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicplayboy.net/?p=590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are links I found interesting for 26/01 through 30/01]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are links I found interesting for 26/01 through 30/01:</p>


<ul>
<li><a href="http://glimmerblocker.org/">GlimmerBlocker</a> &#8212; Ad blocker for Safari implemented as a non-intrusive proxy.</li>
<li><a href="http://noscope.com/journal/2009/01/extra-image-tags-plugin">Noscope | Journal | Extra Image Tags Plugin</a> &#8212; This is a very minimalistic WordPress plugin, which finds all images you insert into your posts, and wrap them in extra divs, so you can style the hell out of them.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.uie.com/articles/three_hund_million_button">The $300 Million Button</a> &#8212; &#8220;It&#39;s hard to imagine a form that could be simpler: two fields, two buttons, and one link. Yet, it turns out this form was preventing customers from purchasing products from a major e-commerce site, to the tune of $300,000,000 a year. What was even worse: the designers of the site had no clue there was even a problem.&#8221;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.officer.com/web/online/Operations-and-Tactics/Cops-Talk-Funny/3$40630">Cops Talk Funny</a> &#8212; &#8220;From recruits in academies to senior officers and command staff, you talk funny when you take the stand. Is it in the water at the academies; is there a secret society where you&#39;re taught this special language?&#8221;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/videogames-outsell-dvd-and-blu-ray-in-2008">Videogames outsell <span class="caps">DVD </span>and Blu-ray in 2008</a> &#8212; Retail sales of videogames overtook that of <span class="caps">DVD </span>and Blu-ray for the first time, as sales of packaged media grew 6 per cent worldwide to hit <span class="caps">USD</span> 61 billion in 2008, according to Media Control GfK International.</li>
</ul>

<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/AtomicPlayboy?i=http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/02/02/links/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/02/02/links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spotify Stinks</title>
		<link>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/01/09/spotify-stinks/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/01/09/spotify-stinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan Svensson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicplayboy.net/?p=482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spotify is a good idea. Too bad that the implementation is pretty horrible. For starters, Spotify makes it very hard to find new music to listen to. I can search just fine, and Spotify even has a modest amount of the music I listen to. But why can&#8217;t I find any new music? If I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.spotify.com/">Spotify</a> is a good idea. Too bad that the implementation is pretty horrible.</p>

<p>For starters, Spotify makes it very hard to find new music to listen to. I can search just fine, and Spotify even has a modest amount of the music I listen to. But why can&#8217;t I find any new music?</p>

<p>If I look at the &#8220;radio&#8221; tab, I see eighteen categories, <em>none of which describe the music I like</em>, and a slider to pick a range of decades of music. The big problem here is that the categories are horribly generic.</p>

<p>I listen to a lot of electronic subgenres, yet the only thing vaguely resembling my taste is &#8220;techno&#8221; &#8212; and I don&#8217;t listen to techno. After 30 minutes of listening to music in this strange techno category, I heard <em>one</em> single song I could <em>maybe</em> classify as techno. The rest was trance, goa trance (which, of course, isn&#8217;t the same as trance), drum and bass, synthpop and futurepop. I can&#8217;t think of any way to make <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boards_of_Canada">Boards of Canada</a> qualify as techno.</p>

<p>They need to take a long hard look at <a href="http://www.last.fm/">last.fm</a>. There I can participate in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy">social tagging</a> and tag artists and groups with whatever genres I think they fit into. Looking at <a href="http://www.last.fm/tag/ebm/artists">the <span class="caps">EBM </span>tag</a> at last.fm I see a fairly accurate representation of actual <span class="caps">EBM </span>&#8211; though I don&#8217;t really know what <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_(band)">Covenant</a> is doing that high up on the list.</p>

<p>Another thing they need to borrow from last.fm: Where are all the other users? Why can&#8217;t I add friends? See what they listen to? Find other users with similar taste in music that way?</p>

<p>Spotify is a nice idea. But it feels too much like Web 1.1 with one-way communication from the music industry to a silent crowd of passive consumers, rather than the social activity you can get at last.fm with user taxonomy, forums, discussion and music comparisons letting you find new music.</p>

<p>If I want to find new music on Spotify the only way is to play the incredibly vague &#8220;techno&#8221; category and hope I stumble upon something I actually like.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.last.fm/user/Echo5ive">This is me on last.fm</a>. At a quick glance you can see what I&#8217;ve listened to recently, what my favorite music is, and if you&#8217;re a registered user, get a comparison to see how our music tastes match.</p>

<p>Get to work, Spotify! We&#8217;re not in the 1990s any longer.</p>

<p><strong>Last-minute edit:</strong> One minute after posting this Spotify gave me opera song and instrumental chamber music&#8230; which is apparently techno.</p>

<p><strong>Update:</strong> It does seem that they actually listen, and <a href="https://www.spotify.com/blog/archives/2008/12/18/spotify-scrobbles/">last.fm scrobbling support was recently added</a>. It&#8217;s a small step forward, at least.</p><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/AtomicPlayboy?i=http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/01/09/spotify-stinks/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/01/09/spotify-stinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Reader</title>
		<link>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/20/google-reader/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/20/google-reader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan Svensson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicplayboy.net/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For my feed reading needs I used Gregarius hosted on my site for nearly three years. But the downside is that I can only update feeds manually. I guess I could do a crontab that does a request for the update page, but I spent three years being too lazy to get that done. I&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my feed reading needs I used <a href="http://gregarius.net/">Gregarius</a> hosted on my site for nearly three years. But the downside is that I can only update feeds manually. I guess I could do a crontab that does a request for the update page, but I spent three years being too lazy to get that done.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve been using <a href="https://www.google.com/reader/">Google Reader</a> for nearly two months now to try it out, and I decided to stick with it. It&#8217;s good, it&#8217;s free, and it has great options for sharing interesting stuff with my friends that also use it (all one of them). You can <a href="https://www.google.com/reader/shared/15863319510059850124">find my shared items here</a> if you&#8217;re interested. Feed also available there. The occasional shared post in Swedish, but mostly English.</p>

<p>Interface-wise there&#8217;s one thing that confuses me though: Google Reader treats folders (for different feeds) and tags (for individual entries) the same. But not.</p>

<p>I exported all my feeds from Gregarius as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPML"><span class="caps">OPML</span></a> and imported them to Google Reader with my old categories preserved. Nothing fancy &#8212; I had categories like People, Tech, Design and so on.</p>

<p>After importing the <span class="caps">OPML,</span> Google Reader picked it up just fine. The problem is when I want to tag individual entries, something I typically do with stuff I want to keep around for later.</p>

<p>The problem: The names of what I think of as &#8220;folders&#8221; show up as tags when I tag individual entries. And it&#8217;s making my brain melt. Google, you got tags in my folders and folders in my tags!</p>

<p>Another problem is that the name of the folder a feed is in is always added as a default tag for all entries from that feed. Very annoying. I have a folder named &#8220;People&#8221;, and that&#8217;s a very poor tag for the items in it.</p><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/AtomicPlayboy?i=http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/20/google-reader/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/20/google-reader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proper Unsubscription</title>
		<link>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/13/proper-unsubscription/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/13/proper-unsubscription/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan Svensson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicplayboy.net/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is how you make a proper unsubscribe feature for your newsletters. I click the &#8220;unsubscribe&#8221; link at the bottom of the email, I get a page with this, and it&#8217;s done. No further action needed. First I thought it was a bit unsecure without a confirmation button, but then I spotted the resubscribe link [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='pi aligncenter size-full wp-image-447'><span class='pib'></span><img src="http://atomicplayboy.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/080513-email.png" width="406" height="172" alt="" title="Working Unsubscription" /></span></p>

<p>This is how you make a proper unsubscribe feature for your newsletters. I click the &#8220;unsubscribe&#8221; link at the bottom of the email, I get a page with this, and it&#8217;s done. No further action needed. First I thought it was a bit unsecure without a confirmation button, but then I spotted the resubscribe link in case you accidentally unsubscribed.</p>

<p>That&#8217;s good design by <a href="http://37signals.com/">37Signals</a>.</p><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/AtomicPlayboy?i=http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/13/proper-unsubscription/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/13/proper-unsubscription/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
