<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Atomic Playboy&#187; email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/tag/email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atomicplayboy.net</link>
	<description>All hail the mushroom cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:19:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Postcards</title>
		<link>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/02/01/postcards/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/02/01/postcards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan Svensson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingvar Åkesson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicplayboy.net/?p=612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ingvar Åkesson, chief spymaster of FRA, was on SR (Sweden&#8217;s Radio) openly declaring that citizens should consider all email sent on the internet to be &#8220;postcards,&#8221; thus making it perfectly okay for anyone who handles the postcard to read its contents. My first question here is what he thinks of people using a new technology [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ingvar Åkesson</strong>, chief spymaster of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_National_Defence_Radio_Establishment"><span class="caps">FRA</span></a>, was on SR (Sweden&#8217;s Radio) openly declaring that citizens should consider all email sent on the internet to be &#8220;postcards,&#8221; thus making it perfectly okay for anyone who handles the postcard to read its contents.</p>
<p>My first question here is what he thinks of people using a new technology called &#8220;envelopes,&#8221; in the shape of asymmetrical public-key encryption. That has to be okay as well, right? (<a href="/pgp-key/">Here&#8217;s my public key</a>.)</p>
<p>Sadly, Swedish politicians have already stated that anonymity and encryption are &#8220;problems&#8221; on the internet. I wonder how long until it&#8217;s illegal to use envelopes for your mail, since it prevents military intelligence agencies from spying on their citizens?</p>
<p>Apart from that Åkesson constructed the usual straw men about how they&#8217;re not at all going to store all email sent. Nearly everyone already knows that they won&#8217;t do this. Our problem with the military surveillance of civilian traffic is that we feel infringed the second our email gets scanned by <span class="caps">FRA, </span>whether they store it or not; whether it&#8217;s done manually or with automated algorithms.</p>
<p><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/AtomicPlayboy?i=http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/02/01/postcards/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2009/02/01/postcards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proper Unsubscription</title>
		<link>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/13/proper-unsubscription/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/13/proper-unsubscription/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan Svensson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicplayboy.net/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is how you make a proper unsubscribe feature for your newsletters. I click the &#8220;unsubscribe&#8221; link at the bottom of the email, I get a page with this, and it&#8217;s done. No further action needed. First I thought it was a bit unsecure without a confirmation button, but then I spotted the resubscribe link [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='pi aligncenter size-full wp-image-447'><span class='pib'></span><img src="http://atomicplayboy.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/080513-email.png" width="406" height="172" alt="" title="Working Unsubscription" /></span></p>
<p>This is how you make a proper unsubscribe feature for your newsletters. I click the &#8220;unsubscribe&#8221; link at the bottom of the email, I get a page with this, and it&#8217;s done. No further action needed. First I thought it was a bit unsecure without a confirmation button, but then I spotted the resubscribe link in case you accidentally unsubscribed.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s good design by <a href="http://37signals.com/">37Signals</a>.</p>
<p><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/AtomicPlayboy?i=http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/13/proper-unsubscription/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/05/13/proper-unsubscription/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today in Emails</title>
		<link>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/04/25/today-in-emails/</link>
		<comments>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/04/25/today-in-emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan Svensson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atomicplayboy.net/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some email about making custom smileys arrives from MSN Live. I don&#8217;t even use the &#8220;official&#8221; MSN client since I refuse to use anything that shoves ads in my face in an intrusive manner. I do use the MSN Messenger service though, so it might be prudent to just unsubscribe to their marketing spam rather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some email about making custom smileys arrives from <span class="caps">MSN</span> Live. I don&#8217;t even use the &#8220;official&#8221; MSN client since I refuse to use anything that shoves ads in my face in an intrusive manner.</p>
<p>I do use the <span class="caps">MSN</span> Messenger service though, so it might be prudent to just unsubscribe to their marketing spam rather than flag it spam and miss potential emails about the actual service. So I click the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the mail, log in, select &#8220;I don&#8217;t want this stuff&#8221; at three different places, click submit, and&#8230; a red-colored text that says &#8220;Error 500&#8243; appears.</p>
<p>I try to submit two more times. More error 500.</p>
<p>This is where I sigh, go back to Gmail, and click &#8220;report spam&#8221;.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some helpful hints from an email user: I can report your mail as spam with a single click. If you can&#8217;t add a one-click unsubscribe link (also, it helps if it actually works), then <em>I can report your mail as spam with a single click</em>. I don&#8217;t want to have to jump through hoops to do this. There&#8217;s no need for me to have to log in and navigate the site to find my account preferences.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all a cost/benefit calculation. This cost me time. The benefit was that I might still want to get things like password reminders (in case I suffer from sudden brain trauma) and information about service changes.</p>
<p>Had this been a web shop I would most likely have clicked &#8220;report as spam&#8221; right away. I can accept having to provide a password, but after that it should opt me out instantly.</p>
<p>The worst offender I&#8217;ve seen here is CD-WOW. After logging in the user preferences had <em>two</em> places where you needed to deselect your spamming preferences &#8212; under separate tabs with nearly identical names. I only spotted one of them, and logically assumed that it would work. Then I got more marketing trash from them, got annoyed since I had already declared my preferences, and now their mails go straight to the spamcan.</p>
<p><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/AtomicPlayboy?i=http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/04/25/today-in-emails/" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://atomicplayboy.net/blog/2008/04/25/today-in-emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: atomicplayboy.net @ 2012-05-24 11:43:02 -->
